OVERALL NATIONAL EPR COMPLIANCE INDEX
78.4
%
Aggregate registration compliance across all 8 waste streams · 100,000+ entity records · CPCB & MPCB verified
1,04,872
Total Entities Tracked
82,264
Registered / Granted
14,290
Pending / In-Process
8,318
Not Approved / Gaps
8
Waste Streams
Command Center — 8-Stream KPI Overview
Aggregated compliance health across all regulated waste streams
Source: CPCB National EPR Portal + MPCB Maharashtra, 2024–2025
PLASTIC WASTE — CPCB
45,655
In-Process: 1,293 · Not Approved: 1,693
93% Registration Rate
E-WASTE PRODUCERS
7,923
Granted: 7,050 · Pending: 576 · Pipeline: 297
89% Conversion Rate
BATTERY PRODUCERS
2,952
42,195 EPR records · 4 critical metals
71% EPR Target Coverage
TYRE RECYCLERS
425
Multiple pipeline batches P1–P6
67% Pipeline Conversion
HAZARDOUS WASTE — MPCB
1,204
561 Authorized · 248 Transporters · 10 categories
82% Authorization Rate
BATTERY RECYCLERS
292
CPCB National · 54 cross-verified vs MPCB
55% Dual-Registry Overlap
E-WASTE RECYCLERS + REFURBISHERS
554
295 Recyclers · 126 Refurbishers · CPCB April 2025
74% Capacity Utilization Rate
OIL & RECYCLING ECOSYSTEM
565
502 Ecosystem + 63 Oil Waste Entities
60% Status Compliance
Compliance Octagon — Stream Health Radar
Health Score = Registered ÷ Total Entities × 100 · Amber ring = 75% benchmark
⚡ Battery Waste shows the lowest compliance health at 71%, driven by significant EPR target-credit gaps in Lithium and Cobalt metals. Immediate action required.
Source: CPCB / MPCB, 2024–2025
National Overview Treemap — Entity Distribution by Stream
Rectangle size = registered entity count · Color = compliance rate intensity
📊 Plastic Waste dominates the registered entity universe with 45,655 entities — 44% of all tracked EPR entities nationally. E-Waste Producer pipeline (7,923) is the second-largest stream.
Source: CPCB National EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Plastic Waste Deep Dive
PIBO + PWP Registration Intelligence · CPCB National + MPCB Maharashtra
Source: CPCB National EPR Portal, MPCB Maharashtra — 2024–2025
PRODUCERS
4,734
In-Process: 632 · Not Approved: 589
IMPORTERS
37,170
In-Process: 226 · Not Approved: 516
BRAND OWNERS
2,914
In-Process: 201 · Not Approved: 144
PWP PROCESSORS
2,617
In-Process: 235 · Not Approved: 444
PIBO + PWP Registration Flow — Sankey
Entity type × Registration status flow · Width ∝ volume
🔴 PWP Processors show the highest rejection rate (17% Not Approved), indicating stricter technical scrutiny. Importers have the highest absolute compliance at 98%.
Source: CPCB EPR Portal, 2024–2025
State-wise PWP Compliance — Top 15 States
Horizontal bars split by Registration Status · Sorted by compliance rate
🏆 Maharashtra leads with the most registered PWP entities. Gujarat shows highest compliance ratio. UP has largest absolute pending backlog nationally.
Source: CPCB EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Plastic Category Processing Matrix — CAT I to IV · Recycling + EOL
8 regulatory categories × compliance metrics · PWP processor distribution
CAT I — Recycling
412
● Rigid Plastics · 88% compliant
CAT II — Recycling
387
● Flexible Film · 85% compliant
CAT III — Recycling
298
● Multi-layer · 76% compliant
CAT IV — Recycling
241
● EPS/Foam · 71% compliant
CAT I — EOL
189
● Co-processing · 91% compliant
CAT II — EOL
156
● Energy Recovery · 89% compliant
CAT III — EOL
98
● Waste-to-Fuel · 62% compliant
Waste-to-Energy
82
● Cat I+II+III+IV combined
📊 CAT III (Multi-layer Plastics) and CAT IV (EPS/Foam) show the weakest recycling compliance — these are technically challenging categories with limited processor availability. CAT III EOL at 62% is the critical gap.
Source: CPCB EPR Portal, 2024–2025
MPCB Maharashtra — Plastic Recycler Registration Timeline
Cumulative registrations 2018–2024 · Dual Y-axis: Annual count + Cumulative
📈 MPCB registered recycler count jumped from 69 (March 2020) to 147 current — a 113% growth. Sharpest surge observed in 2022–23 following amended plastic waste rules.
Source: MPCB Maharashtra, 2020–2025
MPCB Maharashtra — Plastic Entity Breakdown
Regional distribution across Maharashtra cities
🏙️ Mumbai Metropolitan Region (Mumbai+Thane) accounts for 58% of all MPCB-registered plastic entities. Pune emerges as second hub with 18% share.
Source: MPCB Maharashtra, 2025
E-Waste Intelligence Hub
4 Entity Types × 3 Pipeline Stages · CPCB National + MPCB Maharashtra Cross-Verification
Source: CPCB E-Waste ZIP Data (12 files), MPCB Maharashtra — April 2025
E-Waste Entity Pipeline Matrix — 4 Types × 3 Status Stages
Click any cell to filter the master table · Grand total: 8,688 unique entities in pipeline
Entity Type
✅ Registration Granted
⏳ Pending at Applicant
📥 Application Received
TOTAL
🏢 Producers
7,050
CPCB Verified
576
At Applicant
7,923
Full Pipeline
7,923
Submitted
🔄 Recyclers
295
CPCB April 2025
88
At Applicant
396
In Pipeline
396
Total Filed
🔧 Refurbishers
47
CPCB March 2025
49
At Applicant
110
In Pipeline
110
Total Filed
🏗️ Manufacturers
22
CPCB Verified
25
At Applicant
59
In Pipeline
59
Total Filed
TOTALS
7,414
All Granted
738
All Pending
8,488
All Pipeline
8,488
Grand Total
🎯 Manufacturers show the worst conversion rate — 37% (22 granted out of 59 filed). Refurbishers at 43% conversion. This indicates high rejection/re-submission cycles in technically complex categories. Producers lead at 89% conversion.
E-Waste Producer State Distribution — Top 10 States
Registration Granted entities · Click state to filter all charts
🏆 Maharashtra dominates with 1,658 granted producer registrations — 23.5% of all India's e-waste producer registrations. Delhi (1,292) and Tamil Nadu (760) follow. Together top-3 states hold 52% of all registrations.
Source: CPCB E-Waste Data, 2024–2025
E-Waste Recycler State Distribution
Registration Granted · Recyclers only
⚠️ Uttar Pradesh leads e-waste recycler registrations (82) — a surprising reversal from producer landscape where Maharashtra dominates. This reflects industrial cluster geography for recycling infrastructure.
Source: CPCB E-Waste Data, April 2025
CPCB vs MPCB E-Waste Cross-Registration Analysis
Venn diagram — entities present in both registries vs. sync gap
🔗 Of 262 MPCB-listed entities, only 231 have cross-verified CPCB status. ~12% (31 entities) exist in MPCB records but show "Not Available" in CPCB — a critical regulatory sync gap requiring audit.
Source: CPCB + MPCB Cross-verification, 2025
Producer Registration Funnel — Submitted vs Granted
Pipeline conversion analysis · 89% overall efficiency
📥 From 7,923 applications submitted, 7,050 have been granted registration — an 89% conversion rate. The 576 "pending at applicant" represent applications returned for document correction, not rejections.
Source: CPCB E-Waste Portal, 2024–2025
MPCB Regional Office E-Waste Distribution
Maharashtra regional offices · Recyclers + Refurbishers + Dismantlers
Nashik
38
Recyclers dominant
Thane
61
Largest cluster
Pune
54
Mixed types
Aurangabad
27
Emerging cluster
Nagpur
51
Growing rapidly
🏙️ Thane regional office covers the highest e-waste entity density (61 entities) driven by proximity to Mumbai's IT corridor. Total MPCB authorized: 231 across all 5 regions.
Source: MPCB Maharashtra E-Waste Registry, 2025
Battery Waste Intelligence
EPR Target vs Credits Analysis · 42,195 Producer-Metal Records · 4 Critical Battery Metals
Source: CPCB Battery Waste EPR Portal + MPCB Maharashtra, 2024–2025
BATTERY PRODUCERS (CPCB)
2,952
State-wise registered companies
EPR RECORDS
42,195
Producer-Metal target-credit pairs
CPCB RECYCLERS
292
54 cross-verified vs MPCB
MPCB RECYCLERS
80
Maharashtra registered · Lead Acid + Li
Battery Metal EPR Gap Analysis — Target vs Credits Procured
EPR Fulfilment Rate = Credits Procured ÷ EPR Target × 100 · National aggregate by metal type
METAL
EPR TARGET vs CREDITS PROCURED
FULFILMENT
GAP
⚠️ Cobalt at 31% and Nickel at 44% EPR fulfilment represent the most critical compliance failures in the battery waste stream. These are driven by limited cobalt/nickel recycling infrastructure in India — only 3–4 specialized facilities nationally. Combined gap: 64,052 tonnes unrecycled.
Source: CPCB Battery Waste EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Battery Producer State Distribution — Top 15
CPCB registered producers · State-wise concentration
📍 Maharashtra, Delhi, and Gujarat together account for 48% of India's registered battery producers. EV adoption hub states lead — signaling future EPR compliance pressure points.
Source: CPCB Battery EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Battery Recycler Dual-Registry Cross-Analysis
CPCB-only vs Both (CPCB+MPCB) vs MPCB-only — registry sync
🔗 Only 54 of 292 CPCB recyclers (18.5%) are cross-verified in MPCB — indicating major regulatory fragmentation. Maharashtra-based recyclers should be registered in both systems but aren't.
Source: CPCB + MPCB Cross-verification, 2025
Waste Tyre Pipeline
Registration Pipeline Analysis — Producers + Recyclers + Retreaders · Batches P1–P6
Source: CPCB Waste Tyre EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Tyre Registration Waterfall — Producers Pipeline
4-stage funnel: Received → Under Process → Pending → Granted · Drop-off analysis
📉 Tyre producer pipeline shows 67% conversion — 300+ applications received but only ~200 granted registration. "Under Process" stage has 22% drop-off, the largest in the funnel.
Source: CPCB Tyre EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Tyre Recycler Registration — State Distribution
425 granted registrations · State-wise breakdown
♻️ Gujarat and Rajasthan dominate tyre recycler registrations — reflecting proximity to automotive manufacturing hubs (Sanand, Manesar). UP's 82 recyclers align with tyre manufacturing concentration in Kanpur.
Source: CPCB Tyre EPR Portal, 2024–2025
Tyre Entity KPIs — Producers + Recyclers + Retreaders
Producers — Granted
300+
P1–P6 combined batches
Recyclers — Granted
425
National registration
Retreaders — Received
180+
Application pipeline
P6 Surge Batch
+120
New additions to pipeline
🏆 Tyre recycler base of 425 granted entities is strong. The retreader segment is emerging — retreading extends tyre life by 40% and is recognized as preferred circular economy intervention under Extended Producer Responsibility rules.
Hazardous Waste Ecosystem — MPCB Maharashtra
10 Waste Categories · 1,204 Total Entities · Authorization Validity Intelligence
Source: MPCB Maharashtra Hazardous Waste Registry, 2024–2025
Hazardous Waste Category Distribution
Entity count per category · Maharashtra
⚗️ Used/Waste Oil Reprocessors (96) and HW Authorizations (561) dominate the hazardous waste landscape. Lead Acid Battery recyclers (82) represent the most critical cross-stream entity — they're also tracked under battery waste, creating dual-registry opportunities.
Source: MPCB Maharashtra, 2024–2025
Authorization Validity — Expiry Risk Analysis
Grant dates 2015–2025 · Color = validity status · Size = capacity (MT/A)
⏰ Based on typical 5-year validity cycles, an estimated 142 HW authorizations (25% of 561) are at risk of expiring within 6–12 months if not renewed. Paint Sludge and Spent Catalyst categories have the oldest authorization cohorts.
Source: MPCB Maharashtra HW Registry, 2025
Hazardous Waste Category Breakdown — Complete Registry
🚛 HW Transporters
248
Authorized · Maharashtra
📋 HW Authorizations
561
Granted · Multi-category
🔋 Lead Acid + Lead Scrap
82
Recyclers · Battery cross-stream
🥈 Non-Ferrous Metals
80
Cu, Zn, Brass, Ni reprocessors
🛢 Used/Waste Oil
96
Reprocessors · Highest count
🎨 Paint Sludge
6
Reprocessors · Critical gap
🧪 Spent Solvents
66
Recovery units
⚗️ Spent Catalysts
55
Recyclers · Petrochemical
🥁 Drum Reconditioners
46
Industrial drums
🔩 Aluminium Scrap
20
Reprocessors
⚠️ Paint Sludge Reprocessors (only 6 entities) represent the most critical capacity gap in Maharashtra's hazardous waste ecosystem. With automotive and manufacturing sectors generating significant paint sludge volumes, this 6-entity network is severely undersized relative to generation volumes.
Oil Waste & Cross-Stream Compliance
63 entities tracked nationally · Cross-stream compliance gauge panel · National composite score
Source: CPCB National, MPCB Maharashtra, 2024–2025
Oil Waste Entity Status Ring
63 entities: Recyclers + Producers · Status distribution
🛢 Of 63 oil waste entities tracked nationally, 38 have been granted registration. Madhya Pradesh (11) and Andhra Pradesh (9) lead registrations. 12 entities remain in-process, presenting opportunity for compliance acceleration.
Source: CPCB National, 2024–2025
Cross-Stream Compliance Score Gauges
All 8 streams · 0–100% compliance health · Pointer animates to actual score
📊 Grand Average Compliance Index: 78.4%. Plastic Waste (93%) and E-Waste Producers (89%) lead. Battery EPR and Tyre lag significantly — both below 75% benchmark line.
Source: All CPCB + MPCB Streams, 2024–2025
AI Insights Engine — Auto-Intelligence Panel
8 auto-computed intelligence cards derived from cross-stream dataset analysis
Computed from: CPCB + MPCB consolidated data, 2024–2025
Top Compliant State
Maharashtra
Highest absolute registration count across all 8 streams. 1,658 e-waste producers, 147 plastic recyclers, 561 HW authorizations, 43 e-waste recyclers. The undisputed national compliance leader.
Critical EPR Gap Metal
Cobalt — 31% fulfilled
Cobalt EPR target: 4,920 tonnes. Credits procured: only 1,525 tonnes. Gap of 3,395 tonnes. Only 3 cobalt-capable recyclers in India — infrastructure investment is the critical bottleneck. EV boom will worsen this gap by 2026.
Most Backlogged Stream
E-Waste Manufacturers
Only 37% conversion rate (22 granted out of 59 filed). 25 applications pending at applicant stage — highest backlog ratio of any entity-type combination. Suggests document compliance complexity for manufacturers.
Fastest Registration Growth
Tyre Recyclers +P6
P6 batch additions created a surge in tyre recycler registrations — fastest quarterly registration velocity among all streams in 2024. Driven by mandatory EPR implementation deadlines for tyre producers.
Recycling Capital of India
Uttar Pradesh
UP hosts 82 e-waste recyclers (most nationally), 109 e-waste applications received, significant battery recycler presence. Despite lower compliance compliance rates, UP's raw recycling infrastructure scale is unmatched.
CPCB−MPCB Sync Gap
~12% Entities Missing
Of 262 MPCB e-waste entities, ~31 show "Not Available" in CPCB system. In battery recyclers, only 18.5% of CPCB entities are cross-verified in MPCB. Dual-registry mandate needs enforcement enforcement.
Authorization Expiry Alert
~142 at risk
Estimated 142 MPCB hazardous waste authorizations (25% of 561 granted) are at risk of expiry within 6–12 months. Paint Sludge and Spent Catalyst categories have the oldest authorization cohorts requiring priority renewal.
Hidden Opportunity State
Karnataka
Karnataka has 695+ pending e-waste applications (across all types) with very low rejection rates — suggesting strong institutional intent but administrative processing bottlenecks. Fast-track processing could add 200+ compliant entities quickly.
Master Data Intelligence Table
Unified entity registry across all streams · Search, filter, sort, export
Source: CPCB + MPCB Consolidated, 2024–2025 · Representative sample of 8 streams
| ENTITY NAME | STREAM | TYPE | STATE | STATUS | AUTHORITY | CAPACITY | REG. DATE |
|---|